It has been a grueling few years.
After suffering for many years at the hands of an abusive spouse. Seeking help as a male has proven futile. Initially upon request for help the officials involved advocate for the female abuser.
In the military the abusive spouse exploits the fears of the male partner through outrageous behavior causing issues with the male victims military career.
The abuser makes comments and threatens to act out in front of and in the most inappropriate places.
Some of the most unbelievable things have been spewed at our service men as they react completely paralyzed with fear of repeated incidents. Often when these men seek help from their abusive spouse they are ridiculed for being so week and in some cases punished for being a victim of abuse.
This unsettling behavior in many cases drives the male victim to seek redeployment to be free of their abusive spouse.
Other cases the abusive spouse engages in self harm to control their victim leaving them paralyzed and helpless as they have been systematically subdued by their abuser with the assistance of a sex biased system.
If there are children in the mix. The clear and convincing evidence that the US courts favor female litigants is a useful tool in controlling and manipulating the male victim and his children.
In Fourth district Court in Wasatch County this was clearly the case as a father sought help from an abusive spouse.
Initially the father figured with a little help and counseling this may be possible to salvage. This unfortunately was not the case. In this case the female was violently abusive to this man for many years prior to this but when the abuse started happening to the children the father had to ask for help.
Armed with proof in the form of video of the violent episodes, and understanding and knowledge developed from working years in law enforcement he was hopeful the help would come.
At the time he was not aware of the relationship the Judge had in his child hood between his mother and father and that He had testified in a case where the Judge hearing his case lost the court battle regarding him as a child.
He was not aware of the relationship his wife at the time had developed with another man and she was doing every thing she could to manufacture a story claiming he was not faithful and attempting to get him to leave his home so she could claim he abandoned his family. She escalated the abuse repeatedly.
The father had plead with local authorities for help but the Judge acknowledged she was abusive to him but refused to afford him the protection he would have if it were a female victim.
The father presented the video of this abuse to the State workers at DCFS and the Police.
The Police refused to even include they had been provided video of these violent acts against this father and his children. The Police drafted a narrative which excluded any fact and on its face was fraudulent exclaiming there was no abuse despite having been provided clear evidence disproving their statement. The Deputy Chief of Police committed wire fraud to ensure female litigants weren't forced to receive treatment for their abuse on male victims in what appears to be an act of discrimination rooted with personal bias or retaliatory response for some unknown historical event where the officer was reported as acting inappropriately in years prior.
As this father plead for assistance and protection for his children the Victims Advocate for Wasatch County Utah couldn't help but reprimand the father for asking for help even Exclaiming to him that She hated Men of his religion because he explained he had spent significant amounts of time praying for answers on how to address his spouses abuse on him and his children.
A woman working at DCFS who was also post par tum had insisted the father was wrong for recording the violent assaults against him and his children displaying an absolute refusal to accept a female isn't allowed to bludgeon her spouse with sharp and blunt objects and that even if she did assault him it wasn't okay for him to report or record it for evidence to seek help.
After the father was diagnosed with sleep apnea he found himself being strangled as he slept by this abusive woman. He called the police for help but they refused to respond explaining that the officers wife if she did that he would be able to stop her. The issue is that the officer is okay with female assault on a male because he would man handle his own wife if she did this. Knowing the bias in the system this man was not in any way even going to defend himself against assaults out of fear of being named the aggressor.
It is this authors suspicion the wife was attempting to kill her spouse who is a veteran in an attempt to claim he died from sleep apnea so she would be awarded survivors benefits if the disease was service connected.
There are many angles in this stemming from a very intelligent abuser who used advise from her aunt who worked as a patrolman's secretary and other familial relationships to include her family within the Utah courts to encourage actions against this man who so desperately needed help and defense for himself and his children from his abuser.
After the woman forced entry into this mans home while he was inside asleep the Judge took no action to protect him after she admitted and he reported it to him. The Police refused to even refer to the felony violation of a protective order as anything other than a keep the peace effectively denying him the right to the report and concealing her felonious violent crimes. In this incident the officer who produced the fraudulent report and committed wire fraud was given a promotion for his actions. Going from patrolman to patrol sergeant.
It became clear the man had made the mistake of expecting the law to be enforced and protection provided to male victims.
He asked for help from the State office in charge of police officer standards and the Judicial conduct commission. This resulted in retaliation like he had never seen before. He was pulled over by police for no reason really the officer said he was going 3 miles an hour over after he was passed by every other vehicle on the road, and then later for snow falling on his car in a snow storm. The Police department began sending drug informants to try and befriend him. Remember he was a cop in the military he understands this system the man explained to one of the informants that he understood he was trying to work through his issues with the legal system but who ever the officer was that told him to do this was breaking the law and miss using him as a resource. The informant never approached him again and stopped waiting for him at the gas station he used to fill up his car.
The father then was forced to go see a mediator who prior to agreeing to mediation she Kathy Elton in Provo Utah explained to him that he would never see his kids again if he didn't just agree to what his abuser wanted.
The Judge had awarded him full custody of the kids and he and the kids were protected persons on June 4th 2014 but after the Judge found he had expressed concern about sex discrimination the Judge never produced the written order even though he verbally stated the father had full custody and the protective order modification was granted
The man's attorney refused to address the extortion and it was also reported to this man the attorney had been working behind his back to throw the case. This attorney was fired for honest services fraud and the father began seeking new counsel as it appeared there was a relationship with the Judge and the Mediator this attorney was using to create more profit and due special favors not necessarily in the best interest of his client.
During the process the Judge retired but new Judges stepped in often they would set court dates and never tell the father there was a court date. Even in some cases asking the abusive woman's attorney how to proceed as a Judge over divorce cases basically letting the apposing counsel run the court room. It became clear this attorney has a special relationship with members of the Utah Bar and it appeared after he stole medical records from the fathers medical records without authorization the Bar wouldn't address his criminal conduct.
The final Court hearing was only discovered because the apposing party accidentally mentioned it in front of the kids who shared this information with their dad. It wasn't even shown on the court calendar. It is believed the Judge at the time Judge Brown of the Utah 4th district court was attempting to claim the father was notified and then rule under default in favor of this man and his children's abuser the mother.
It is a very creative process for human trafficking, but because of the use of fraud and Racketeering this is Human trafficking in cases like this every event where the father loses a right such as a right to property in the way of wages it is a distinctly separate offence of Human trafficking.
The State attorney is also a player in this as without proof the father didn't provide support during a period the children lived with the father prior to any proceedings in this case the court used no due process or evidence to steel wages the father had already used to support the kids. The State ORS office violated the fathers Rights to due process and all rules of evidence regarding this case awarding a decision on the statements of one party.
Utah is a slave state where Men are sold into slavery through the use of fraud and racketeering through organized crime hidden in our "Just Us" system.
During the final court case the State attorney insisted the father had waived his rights to council which in no way was true. The fathers council was never informed of the hearing. The state attorney strong armed the father with threats of increasing the financial burden on him if he didn't agree to the terms and proceed without council stating his client was eager to finish this case.
After contacting the attorney who had represented the father the question was posed as to why the attorney was a no show. The attorney explained to the father that she was never informed of the case. Also that she was fined after she addressed the Judges meeting with the other council and working behind the scenes basically with the apposing council to establish the outcome of the case.
The Judge and the DA in Wasatch county excluded the father the victim of domestic abuse from the hearings for the felony charges against his abuser. It is believed the prosecution was encouraged to throw the case forcing the father into a financial situation which would prevent him from addressing or beginning a case against the abuser and the individuals in the system who intentionally fixed the tickets and threatened the father for seeking help against public corruption and domestic violence with child abuse.
